Go to Blog
February 5, 2025
Words by
Ileana Marcut

Designing AI features: How much "AI" should you show?

How do we decide when AI should stay in the background and how much information do users need?

AI shapes how we search, shop, create, communicate, and make life-changing decisions. It curates playlists, enhances photos, flags fraud, screens job applications, and powers chatbots.

AI is still new, experimental, and lacking standard conventions. Some AI features need to be fully evident, while others work best quietly in the background. And then there's the question of user control, privacy, and ethical responsibility.

How do we decide when AI should be visible when it should stay in the background, and how much information users actually need? Let's explore.

Visible versus invisible AI functionality

AI works behind the scenes every day, doing things we don't think twice about. When spam filters catch junk emails, photo tools auto-enhance images, or Netflix recommends your next binge, we don't need constant reminders that AI is at work. It's just part of the experience.

But what happens when AI moves from simple automation to decision-making? Imagine applying for a job and getting rejected without knowing if a human or an algorithm made that decision.

This is where transparency becomes crucial.

If AI is making a decision that impacts people's life, finances, job opportunities, legal rights, or medical care. They need to know.

When should people know AI is involved?

AI should be visible when:

How much AI visibility is enough?

Not all AI visibility needs to be the same. Some cases call for a simple label, while others require clearer explainability and user control.

🤖 Take chatbots, for example. Users shouldn't mistake AI for a human agent, so adding a tiny notice, "I'm an AI assistant, but I can connect you with a human if needed." is usually enough.

✨ For AI-generated news articles or video content, transparency needs to go further. These should be clearly labeled, along with disclaimers, to prevent misinformation.

🔥 And when AI makes high-stakes decisions, transparency alone isn't enough. People should also be able to challenge decisions, review explanations, and request human intervention.

💡 AI transparency should be progressive. Some users just want a light hint that AI is involved, while others need a full breakdown of how it works. The best approach is to let users decide how much information they want.

Informing about using user data

Whenever AI processes user-generated content, like text inputs, voice commands, or uploaded photos, there should be a clear answer to these questions:

Applications should offer clear privacy settings that let users manage AI-driven personalization, decide whether their data is used for learning, and delete stored AI interactions.

When AI stays invisible while learning from user behavior, the line between seamless experience and hidden surveillance gets blurry.

Handling AI transparency

There's no one-size-fits-all rulebook for AI in digital products because we're still defining these standards. So, how do we strike the right balance?


Getting ready for upcoming AI regulations

The EU AI Act and other upcoming regulations are set to promote transparency in AI, requiring companies to share details about things like automated decision-making, AI-generated content, and data handling.


But let's not wait for these rules to kick in! 🫶

Read more

Ready to build something amazing?

Discuss with our experts and discover how we can turn your ideas into remarkable realities.

Book a discussion